Showing posts with label Clash of the Titans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Clash of the Titans. Show all posts

Friday, April 2, 2010

The Titans, they are a'clashiiiiiiiiiiing... [REVIEW]


I had a chance to see Clash of the Titans a night early, and quite earlier than expected. There were actually screenings earlier than just your typical "midnight opening" at 12:01. This was actually at 9:15 PM, and that wasn't even the earliest one. This isn't something that happens often (right?), so I took advantage, because sometimes by the time I get to a midnight showing my mind is too sluggish, and movies that are probably paced perfectly fine seem to drag on. Well, enough of that useless little anecdote; this post is about the movie. So, how was it?
Well, the biggest problem with the whole thing is probably that it can never overcome its origins. I don't think it's impossible to make a compelling film revolving around Greek mythology, but it sure as hell isn't easy. That the story doesn't stray too far from the 1981 original is the film's greatest bane. The whole thing is just silly, and Louis Leterrier's film struggles to find a proper tone. Characters get beat up, scratched, and injured, yet it's hard to be even remotely invested in the whole thing, even on a purely superficial level. A good deal of it is thanks to the silliness of the dialogue. Pete Postlethwaite (you were in In the Name of the Father, for God's sake...what happened?), who's barely in the movie, gets some of the worst, in the form of a condensed speech that feels too much like a greatest hits version of "call to action" speeches. Then there's Sam Worthington, whose performance and facial expressions reminds of something 30Rock's Liz Lemon (Tina Fey) said to ex-boyfriend Drew (Jon Hamm) in a recent episode: "Soooo handsome....so, so stupid." For all of Worthington's attempts at Russell Crowe-esque brooding, not to mention his anachronistic haircut, he's a blank slate. Particularly bad are the scenes when he isn't speaking. His reaction shots when he isn't speaking are just so damn blank, and it's a problem right from the get-go. Then there's Gemma Artreton as Io, Perseus' guardian, who has been watching him since his birth, despite some hints at romantic tension (wait a minute, significantly older, ageless being who creepily teases a younger person? Could this be Reverse Twilight?). Io's main purpose is to guide Perseus, all while modeling off-the shoulder dresses for Calvin Klein. But best (worst?) of all are our two prestige actors: Liam Neeson and Ralph Fiennes as Zeus and Hades, respectively. Neeson, who's dressed in the world's shiniest armor, is predictably credible as Zeus, as is Fiennes as the pale Hades (even if he does hoarsely whisper every damn line). They're fun enough that I actually wanted to see more of them, and less of those pesky humans and their lame comic relief. A real "clash" movie would be one revolving around a battle between the gods themselves, not just Zeus and Hades. Even the action scenes and special effects (by the way, skip the 3D if you see it) don't really engage, although the drawn-out reveal of the kraken is nicely done. However, my friend made an interesting comment as we were leaving the theaters, about how she was so excited to see Ridley Scott's Robin Hood because "it has real people fighting real people, not real people fighting green screens and props." While I don't have a problem with CGI violence, she has a point. If you're going to do CGI battles, they need to be part of a story that keeps you engaged in the action, which Clash of the Titans doesn't. The Medusa in particular is cartoonish, and the giant scorpions are in a strange middle ground. The only thing that is consistent are the rich (albeit campy) production values and the lively score. But in the end it comes down to tone, character development, and writing, and sadly, Leterrier's film fails in all three departments. It's inconsistent in tone, poorly developed character wise, and filled with either dull or silly dialogue ("calm your storm" might be one of the funniest euphemisms for "stop getting aroused") that leads to an identity crisis. You might have some fun with it on the big screen, but overall, this is the sort of film you enjoy ironically with your friends, making jokes about it RiffTrax/MST3K style.

Grade: C

Sunday, March 28, 2010

2010 2nd Quarter Preview: April, May, June

With only three full days left in March, it's once again time to look ahead to find more excuses to visit the theater over the next three months. 2010 is off to a decent start so far (well, I've only seen four movies so...), but thankfully, we're about to leave the dreaded first quarter behind and move into late spring and early summer! Cue the string of back-to-back big budget box office hopefuls, and the occasional summer indie (maybe even one that goes all the way to the top) hoping to successfully offer an alternative to the loudness of big studio fare. These eleven films aren't the only reasons to go the theater over the next three months (I'm sure some will undergo release date changes, not to mention that summer indies have painfully slow expansions and can appear out of nowhere), but they're the most notable.

11. The A-Team [June 11 - Wide] dir. Joe Carnahan
Who's in it?: Liam Neeson, Bradley Cooper, Sharlto Copely, Jessica Biel, Patrick Wilson
What's the story?: An adaptation of the 80s TV action series.
Why:
  • It looks loud and fun.
  • Sharlto Copely, who had a terrific breakout in District 9 is getting work. Yay!
  • Cigar-chomping Liam Neeson.
Why Not:
  • Uninspired trailer.
  • TV adaptations don't have the best history.
  • Why does Bradley Cooper always look so smug?
10. Jonah Hex [June 18 - Wide] dir. Jimmy Hayward
What's the story?: A bounty hunter tries to stop a voodoo practitioner from unleashing the undead to liberate the Old South.
Who's in it?: Josh Brolin, Michael Fassbender, Megan Fox, Michael Shannon, John Malkovich
Why:
  • Strong cast.
  • Good source material with a cool mix of magic and the Old West.
Why Not:
  • No trailer. No new posters. No buzz. Nada.
09. Date Night [April 9 - Wide] dir. Shawn Levy
What's the story?: A case of mistaken identities traps a married couple in a gangster-filled night of insanity.
Who's in it?: Steve Carrell, Tina Fey, Mark Wahlberg, James Franco, Mila Kunis, Kristen Wiig, Taraji P. Henson
Why:
  • Carrell and Fey are a great comic duo, and star on two of the best comedies currently on TV.
  • The action-comedy genre is tricky, but when done right it can be a blast.
  • Great supporting cast.
  • Solid trailer.
Why Not:
  • Funny people doesn't mean a funny movie.
  • Could be a classic case of "everything funny was in the trailer".
  • No early word.
08. I Love You, Phillip Morris [May 7 - LA only] dirs. Glenn Ficarra and John Requa
What's the story?: A con man falls in love with a fellow in mate, and tries to maintain a relationship as he continuously escapes/is trapped in prison.
Who's in it?: Jim Carrey, Ewan McGregor, Leslie Mann, Rodrigo Santoro
Why:
  • A true and unique story that reportedly handles the homosexual subject manner extremely well.
  • Strong praise for the performances (especially McGregor).
Why Not:
  • It's been delayed for ages.
  • The reviews have generally been good, but not great.
  • It's difficult to tell how much of Jim Carrey's schtick is intact for the performance.
07. Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time [May 28 - Wide] dir. Mike Newell
What's the story?: Prince Dastan must return a time-controlling dagger to its home to prevent an evil wizard from using its powers to take over the world.
Who's in it?: Jake Gyllenhaal, Ben Kingsley, Gemma Artreton, Alfred Molina
Why:
  • The 2003 video game (of the same name) was a stellar example of how video games can tell a simple-yet-engaging story, mixed with amazing action and environments.
  • The game's creator, Jordan Mechner, was commissioned to come up with the story.
  • Director Mike Newell is no stranger to big budget fantasy fare; he directed 2005's Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.
  • Jerry Bruckheimer has likened the tone to Pirates of the Caribbean.
  • The trailer doesn't make the film look cheap.
Why Not:
  • Was Gyllenhaal the best choice for the prince?
  • The story is quite different from that of the video game, which has a knockout of a finale. If it ain't broke...
  • The special effects look fine, but that's it.
  • Pirates of the Caribbean (well, the first one) was a special pop culture phenomenon with a brilliant lead character. Just having two comically bickering leads doesn't mean that you'll achieve the same charm of that franchise.
06. Clash of the Titans [April 2 - Wide] dir. Louis Leterrier
What's the story?: Perseus, the son of Zeus, must stop the gods from unleashing total chaos (and the kraken) on increasingly anti-theist mankind.
Who's in it?: Sam Worthington, Liam Neeson, Ralph Fiennes, Gemma Artreton, Alexa Davalos, Mads Mikkelson
Why:
  • Rockin' trailer (that song better be on the soundtrack)
  • How can you resist seeing Liam Neeson bellow "RELEASE THE KRAKEN!" on the big screen?
  • Special effects have come a looooong way since the original, lending the film a slick, super-charged vibe. The action looks kinetic without being confusing.
  • Liam Neeson and Ralph Fiennes on screen together again. Schindler and Goeth don't have sh*t on Zeus and Hades.
  • The studio actually gave the film more money to add extra monsters/gods.
Why Not:
  • Could extra monsters/gods create clutter?
  • Louis Leterrier's The Incredible Hulk had effective action, but was utterly brain dead in between fights.
  • Could struggle with tone issues. Will they try and be gritty and epic, or maintain some of the camp of the original?
  • A rushed conversion to 3D has left those at previews unimpressed (the film was delayed a week because of this conversion).
  • Sam Worthington needs to carry the movie, and, like Keira Knightley, he can be very good or very bland.
05. Robin Hood [May 14 - Wide] dir. Ridley Scott
What's the story?: An archer in the army of Richard the Lionhearted fights against the Normans and becomes the legendary Robin Hood.
Who's in it?: Russell Crowe, Cate Blanchett, Mark Strong, Danny Huston, Max Von Sydow, William Hurt
Why:
  • A fresh, gritty take on the Robin Hood story with a knock out cast.
  • Crowe and Scott are a reliable combination.
  • Russell Crowe and Cate Blanchett, together at last.
  • Ridley Scott films always have lush period details, making you feel like you're in X time period.
  • The action is reportedly very gritty, with very few special effects shots (most of which are just for a fleet of ships).
  • Brian Helgeland, the writer behind that masterpiece LA Confidential, wrote the screenplay, trying to give it a more historical angle.
Why Not:
  • The off chance that it ends up being dull.
  • Crowe and Blanchett may not have the right chemistry.
  • The actor who plays King John seems a little over the top ("I declare him an out-LAAAAAAAAAW!!")
04. Kick Ass [April 16 - Wide] dir. Matthew Vaughn
What's the story?: Dave Lizewski, an ordinary student, decides to become a super hero, and inspires a wave of masked vigilantes, angering a local mob syndicate.
Who's in it?: Aaron Johnson, Nicholas Cage, Mark Strong, Christopher Mintz-Plasse, Chloe Moretz
Why:
  • Fantastic reception from the SXSW Film Festival. Some reviews hailed it as the best super hero flick behind The Dark Knight (albeit completely different in tone).
  • The mix of visceral action and laugh out loud comedy also has a surprising share of emotional weight.
  • The performances have earned across the board praise, especially young Moretz as the purple-haired, foul-mouthed Hit Girl.
  • Finally a chance to see Nicholas Cage give a knowingly silly performance.
  • Mintz-Plasse is inching closer to breaking out of his McLovin' mould.
Why Not:
  • Matthew Vaughn's last film, Stardust, was generally well received, but was really a clunky, poorly structured film. Let's hope it doesn't carry over here.
03. I am Love [June 18 - Limited] dir. Luca Guadagnino
What's the story?: At the turn of the millennium, a prominent Milanese family is shaken by romantic passions and infidelity.
Who's in it?: Tilda Swinton, various and sundry Italians
Why:
  • Have you seen the trailer? If you haven't, it calls to mind A Single Man, which teased beautifully without giving away its minimal plot at all.
  • Early reviews have been extremely positive, especially for Swinton, who was criminally snubbed for Oscar consideration last year for her work in Julia.
  • The music is by opera composer John Adams, who is composing his first ever film score (sadly, the music in the trailer is from previous work).
  • Even if it's bad, it will sure as hell be gorgeous.
Why Not:
  • Is it just empty prettiness?
02. Toy Story 3 [June 18 - Wide] dir. Lee Unkrich
What's the story?: When Andy departs for college, the toys are donated to a day-care, and must cope with the change.
Who's in it?: Tom Hanks, Tim Allen, John Ratzenberger, Joan Cusack, Michael Keaton, Bonnie Hunt
Why:
  • The original Pixar masterpiece comes full circle.
  • According to early word, if WALL-E or UP!, made you cry, you'll be bawling over the last (brilliant) 20 minutes of this one.
  • Written by Michael Arndt of Little Miss Sunshine fame.
Why Not:
  • The one in a million chance that it's either just "good", or even "bad". Yeah, probably not.
01. Iron Man 2 [May 7 - Wide] dir. Jon Favreau
What's the story?: Tony Stark must deal with his newfound super hero status, demands from the government to hand over the Iron Man suit, and new threats from a business rival and a deranged Russian villain with a vendetta named Whiplash.
Who's in it?: Robert Downey Jr., Gwyneth Paltrow, Don Cheadle, Mickey Rourke, Sam Rockwell, Scarlett Johannson, Samuel L. Jackson
Why:
  • The first was a surprise thrill ride, and this one looks bigger and better.
  • Mickey Rourke looks f-ing insane.
  • With the Tony Stark universe established, the film can jump right into the good stuff without all of the set up from before.
  • Fun new cast members.
Why Not:
  • I still wish Emily Blunt had gotten the Black Widow role over Johannson.
  • It could be judged too harshly next to its predecessor.

Saturday, March 20, 2010

"Clash of the Titans" clip - 'Who Was That?'


I really only have one question about this footage. Calibos is trying to hold Perseus by the hair at one point...so how does that work out with Sam Worthington still wearing his Avatar buzz cut?

Saturday, February 27, 2010

"Clash of the Titans" Olympic TV spot - new footage!


I love the new glimpses in the trailer, but the one I'm most curious about is that last bit where it cuts off. Was that a meteor? Exploding rubble? WHAT!?

Thursday, January 14, 2010

First Quarter Preview: Slim pickings from January to March

Even though we're still a month and a half away from the end of Awards Season 09-10, we shouldn't forget that there are other movies coming out; movies from the current year. That said, January, February, and March don't offer a whole lot, even on the indie side of things (I'm done with giving Noah Baumbach chances, so I'm not wasting time in the theater on Greenberg). So what of interest is left? Not much. And by not much, I mean that one of the entries on this list is still technically a 2009 film. Please, pleeeeeeeease tell me that 2010 will pick up as the year goes on. That whining aside, here are seven (ish) reasons to go to the theater for something new, and not for whatever Oscar hopefuls are still on your checklist.

7. Last Night dir. Massy Tadjedin: March 19th [Limited]
What's it all about?: A husband and wife, while apart due to the husband being on a business trip, both flirt with temptation as the husband travels with an attractive co-worker and the wife accidentally meets up with a former flame.
Who's in it?: Keira Knightley, Sam Worthington, Eva Mendes, Guillaume Canet
Why?:
  • Interesting, character-driven premise
  • Young, attractive, and generally talented cast (the verdict's still out on Mendes)
Why Not?:
  • No trailer, no poster, no buzz.
  • Knightley and Worthington can be very good...or very bland.
6. Green Zone dir. Paul Greengrass: March 12th [Wide]
What's it all about?: After discovering faulty intelligence, a US Army officer goes rogue to find WMD's.
Who's in it?: Matt Damon, Greg Kinnear, Amy Ryan, Brendan Gleeson, Jason Isaacs
Why?:
  • Great cast led by the generally reliable Damon, who has proven himself as a quality leading man for action flicks.
  • Greengrass knows how to turn gritty action into thrilling cinema (Bourne 2 and 3).
  • Could be a nice substitute if Bourne 4 never materializes.
Why Not?:
  • The action-packed trailer is curiously uninteresting, despite the subject matter.
  • Could end up trivializing the war angle in favor of bigger, louder, action scenes.
5. The Wolfman dir. Joe Johnston: February 12th [Wide]
What's it all about?: [from Imdb] After returning to his ancestral home, an American is bitten and cursed by a werewolf.
Who's in it?: Benicio Del Toro, Emily Blunt, Anthony Hopkins, Hugo Weaving
Why?:
  • Has the potential to be a classy-yet-gory period horror flick.
  • Wonderful cast, and decent trailer showcasing the moody period ambiance.
  • Anthony Hopkins compared Blunt to a young Jodie Foster during/after filming.
Why Not?:
  • Re-shoots were ordered, and the film has already been pushed back a few times.
  • The design of the wolfman himself has been altered (from being on all fours to a more upright, bipedal form....or it might be the other way around).
  • Decent-to-mixed buzz from test screenings.
4. Alice in Wonderland dir. Tim Burton: March 5th [Wide]
What's it all about?: 10 years after she first went down the rabbit hole, Alice returns to Wonderland after finding out about her arranged marriage, only to find that the Red Queen has taken control.
Who's in it?: Johnny Depp, Mia Wasikowska, Helena Bonham Carter, Anne Hathaway, Michael Sheen, Alan Rickman, Christopher Lee
Why?:
  • Wonderful, wonderful cast, filling all of the right roles (Bonham Carter looks hysterical).
  • Not only is it not a direct remake, it's based off of parts of Lewis Carroll's books that weren't featured in the classic Disney cartoon version.
  • The mix of live action and CGI is beautiful, albeit cartoony.
  • Mia Wasikowska has proven her talent on the TV show "In Treatment".
  • Alice wearing battle armor. 'Nuff said.
Why Not?:
  • Is Johnny Depp's role too prominent? The title is ALICE in Wonderland, not The Mad Hatter in Wonderland, after all.
  • Will the CGI/live action blend somehow backfire?
  • It's yet another Burton film that isn't original. Seriously, when is he going to make another Edward Scissorhands-esque movie?
3. Clash of the Titans dir. Louis Leterrier: March 26th [Wide]
What's it all about?: A man born of a god, Perseus, must try to stop the minions of the underworld from breaking free to wreak havoc on the earth.
Who's in it?: Sam Worthington, Liam Neeson, Ralph Fiennes, Pete Postlethwaite, Gemma Artreton, Alexa Davalos, Danny Huston
Why?:
  • Rockin' trailer.
  • Finally, a halfway decent movie rooted in Greek mythology (special effects have come a long way since the original film was made).
  • The studio has enough faith in the film that it's actually being given MORE money to film extras scenes and add in more gods/monsters.
  • Sam Worthington officially takes his place as the new king of sci-fi/fantasy blockbusters.
  • Liam Neeson and Ralph Fiennes as feuding gods: Schindler vs. Goeth was nothing compared to Zeus vs. Hades.
Why Not?:
  • Louis Leterrier isn't the best director, even for action driven films; his Hulk reboot was brain dead when it wasn't in action mode.
  • Could the added gods/monsters result in an overcrowded film with forced appearances from famed mythological creatures?
  • Is Worthington going to deliver the same level of bland "tough leading man" schtick as in Avatar?
2. A Prophet (Un Prophete) dir. Jacques Audiard: February 12th [Limited]
What's it all about?: [from Imdb] A young Arab man is sent to a French prison where he becomes a mafia kingpin.
Who's in it?: Tahar Rahim, Niels Arestrup, Adel Bencherif
Why?:
  • The critically hailed drama, finally making its stateside debut, has earned comparisons to The Godfather.
  • Chilling trailer that promises a combination of character study and blazing guns.
  • Interesting setting/angle (French Muslims).
Why Not?:
  • It could end up being either just "good", or hugely overrated.
1. Shutter Island dir. Martin Scorcese: February 19th [Wide]
What's it all about?: Two federal marshals search for a murderess who somehow escaped a top security facility.
Who's in it?: Leonardo DiCaprio, Mark Ruffalo, Ben Kinglsey, Emily Mortimer, Michelle Williams, Patricia Clarkson, Jackie Earle Hayley, Max Von Sydow
Why?:
  • Great cast, great trailer, great director, great source material.
  • Dennis Lehane novels have a pretty successful track record as far as adaptations go.
  • It wasn't pushed back to finish editing or re-shoot; test screening results have been through the roof.
  • Martin Scorcese directing a psychological mystery/thriller/horror film? Count me in.
Why Not?:
  • The same screenwriter also wrote Oliver Stone's Alexander.
  • It's going to hurt a lot when you realize that the current Oscar season would have been so much more interesting if this film had been released back in October.
  • It's going to hurt even more if the film gets snubbed for next year's awards due to its terrible timing (two weeks before the Oscar ceremony).

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Teaser Trailer: "Clash of the Titans" (2010) starring Sam Worthington, Liam Neeson, Ralph Fiennes, and Gemma Artreton



What can I say, I'm a sucker for this time period, and the fact that this could be that rare film that deals with mythology in a way that isn't cheesy only has me more excited. The special effects and sets look gorgeous, as do the production values, and the action looks intense. And while Worthington may be the star (and will be a much bigger star after "Avatar" opens in December), I just couldn't be more excited to see Liam Neeson and Ralph Fiennes as dueling Greek gods. "Schindler's List" rematch, anyone?

EDIT: I just noticed that some of the monsters had a very Guillermo Del Toro-esque feel to them. I know he wasn't in any way involved in the film, but I love Del Toro's creature style ("Pan's Labyrinth" and the Hellboy films are stellar examples) because it combines grittiness, coolness, and a bit of ugliness for something totally weird and fun.

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

First photo from "Clash of the Titans" (2010)

Source: Slashfilm.com

/Film reader Christopher M has sent over the first real photo from Louis Leterrier’s remake of Clash of the Titans. The production still shows Sam Worthington as Perseus, “the mortal son of Zeus who was born a god but raised as a man.” Worthington was the best part of Terminator Salvation, and I have high hopes for him in Avatar. The photo appears to be a magazine scan, possibly from the new issue of Empire. Check out the full photo after the jump.

sam worthington clash of the titans

Helpless to save his family from Hades (Ralph Fiennes), vengeful god of the underworld, Perseus volunteers to lead a dangerous mission to defeat Hades before he can seize power from Zeus (Liam Neeson) and unleash hell on earth. Leading a daring band of warriors, Perseus sets off on a perilous journey deep into forbidden worlds. Battling unholy demons and fearsome beasts, he will only survive if he can accept his power as a god, defy his fate and create his own destiny.

Rounding out the cast is Gemma Arterton (Quantum of Solace) as Io, Perseus’ mysterious spiritual guide throughout his journey; Mads Mikkelsen (”Casino Royale”) as Draco, who takes up his sword to join Perseus’ quest; Jason Flemyng (The Curious Case of Benjamin Button) as Acrisius, a one-time king-turned-hideous beast; and Alexa Davalos (Defiance) as Andromeda, a princess doomed to lose her life if Perseus does not succeed.

Clash of the Titans is currently shooting, and is set for a March 26th 2010 release.