Showing posts with label Shutter Island. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shutter Island. Show all posts

Friday, February 19, 2010

"Shutter Island" - REVIEW


There are an eerie number of similarities to be found in Martin Scorcese's Shutter Island and John Hillcoat's The Road. First, both are adapted from acclaimed novels; second, both adaptations are quite faithful to the events from the novels; third, both feature acclaimed directors and actors; and last (and worst) of all, both were delayed. This, however, is where they diverge. Whereas The Road was delayed by a full year in order to have a less rushed post-production period, as well as to tweak the film based on test screenings, Scorcese's film had been completed for a goodly while, and had been testing through the roof. The question remains then, why on earth was such a damn good film pushed into the "dead zone" of film releases, instead of pushed as a prime Oscar contender? Was there trouble in the studio, or in the marketing department? Was the film actually testing poorly? Was it Paramount's financial situation? Most likely it's the latter, but that mostly comes down to speculation, and that's not what this post is about; we're here to talk about Shutter Island, the latest collaboration between Martin Scorcese and Leonardo DiCaprio (this being their fourth).

Adapted from Dennis Lehane's chilling 2003 novel of the same title (thank god they didn't change it to "Ashecliffe," as had been rumored), the film is the story of Boston-based federal marshals (or in this case: DUAHLLY APPOINTED FEHDERAHL MAHSHALLS) Teddy Daniels (Leonardo DiCaprio) and Chuck Aule (Mark Ruffalo). Set in 1954, the film opens with the pair on a ferry to Shutter Island, where criminally insane murderess Rachel Solando (Emily Mortimer, always a welcome presence) has mysteriously vanished without a trace. However, as indicated in any of the marketing, there's more going on at Shutter Island that anyone could have predicted.

One of the most immediately striking aspects of Scorcese's latest is that is feels so, well...un-Scorcese like. In style it feels more like one big creepy homage to both Hitchcock and Kubrick's The Shining (1980). Creepy imagery seems to fill every frame, even in the daytime, and even when it doesn't, the film throws you off balance with blaring, ominous music. In the film's most obvious Kubrick reference, unsettling horns and strings cry out as the camera follows a car along a seemingly safe, winding road. Only minutes later, we're given the opposite: Teddy sees, in slow motion, a particularly eerie patient look up at him and hold her finger to her lips while mouthing "shhhh," all in complete silence. This may not be Scorcese's next masterpiece, but if there's one thing clear, it's that Shutter Island is Scorcese's at his most un-restrained, and most gleefully cinematic and genre-conscious. But be warned, the film is something of a slow-burner, and it will require your full attention. And it's long (2 hrs 18 min).

But ultimately what works about Shutter Island is, ironically what partially hurt The Road: extreme faithfulness to the source material (to be fair, McCarthy's novel was never going to be easy to film...ever). The story remains as compelling as it was on page, even if it might not move as quickly as expected. It also benefits from its superb casting, not only in DiCaprio and Ruffalo (who is underused; the character isn't actually THAT prominent), but in the wide range of supporting players such as Ben Kingsley and Max Von Sydow. But the three who really stand out here are the women: Michelle Williams as Teddy's wife, Emily Mortimer as Rachel Solando, and Patricia Clarkson as a, well, mysterious woman. Williams is graceful and quietly magnetic, as is Clarkson in her one scene, but for me it's Mortimer who partially steals the show. The bug-eyed could have been done by anyone, but there's a particular dream sequence where she and Scorcese's style shine. She appears behind Teddy, covered in the blood of the three bodies at her feet, with her face looking like it was streaked by a madman's paintbrush. It's one of several haunting images that make the film memorable.

And that might just be the only significant issue I have with Shutter Island: the style. The film certainly isn't hollow, but in visually amping up the creep factor, the film's characters, even central protagonist Teddy, don't resonate as emotionally as they perhaps could have. This, along with the slightly dragged out, spell-it-all-out ending, hamper the film, but only slightly. All in all, the performances (DiCaprio is quite strong as a man gradually questioning his own sanity), the music (none of which is original, and ranges from Mahler to Max Richter) and most of all Scorcese's direction and the atmosphere he creates, add up to create one hell of a creep-fest that stands as proof that February doesn't have to be a dark period for theatrical releases.

Grade: B+/B

The wait...


...was totally worth it.


More info coming, I promise.

Sunday, February 7, 2010

Movies at the Superbowl: "Shutter Island"

This one just looks better and better every day. I honestly CAN NOT wait for this.

Thursday, January 14, 2010

First Quarter Preview: Slim pickings from January to March

Even though we're still a month and a half away from the end of Awards Season 09-10, we shouldn't forget that there are other movies coming out; movies from the current year. That said, January, February, and March don't offer a whole lot, even on the indie side of things (I'm done with giving Noah Baumbach chances, so I'm not wasting time in the theater on Greenberg). So what of interest is left? Not much. And by not much, I mean that one of the entries on this list is still technically a 2009 film. Please, pleeeeeeeease tell me that 2010 will pick up as the year goes on. That whining aside, here are seven (ish) reasons to go to the theater for something new, and not for whatever Oscar hopefuls are still on your checklist.

7. Last Night dir. Massy Tadjedin: March 19th [Limited]
What's it all about?: A husband and wife, while apart due to the husband being on a business trip, both flirt with temptation as the husband travels with an attractive co-worker and the wife accidentally meets up with a former flame.
Who's in it?: Keira Knightley, Sam Worthington, Eva Mendes, Guillaume Canet
Why?:
  • Interesting, character-driven premise
  • Young, attractive, and generally talented cast (the verdict's still out on Mendes)
Why Not?:
  • No trailer, no poster, no buzz.
  • Knightley and Worthington can be very good...or very bland.
6. Green Zone dir. Paul Greengrass: March 12th [Wide]
What's it all about?: After discovering faulty intelligence, a US Army officer goes rogue to find WMD's.
Who's in it?: Matt Damon, Greg Kinnear, Amy Ryan, Brendan Gleeson, Jason Isaacs
Why?:
  • Great cast led by the generally reliable Damon, who has proven himself as a quality leading man for action flicks.
  • Greengrass knows how to turn gritty action into thrilling cinema (Bourne 2 and 3).
  • Could be a nice substitute if Bourne 4 never materializes.
Why Not?:
  • The action-packed trailer is curiously uninteresting, despite the subject matter.
  • Could end up trivializing the war angle in favor of bigger, louder, action scenes.
5. The Wolfman dir. Joe Johnston: February 12th [Wide]
What's it all about?: [from Imdb] After returning to his ancestral home, an American is bitten and cursed by a werewolf.
Who's in it?: Benicio Del Toro, Emily Blunt, Anthony Hopkins, Hugo Weaving
Why?:
  • Has the potential to be a classy-yet-gory period horror flick.
  • Wonderful cast, and decent trailer showcasing the moody period ambiance.
  • Anthony Hopkins compared Blunt to a young Jodie Foster during/after filming.
Why Not?:
  • Re-shoots were ordered, and the film has already been pushed back a few times.
  • The design of the wolfman himself has been altered (from being on all fours to a more upright, bipedal form....or it might be the other way around).
  • Decent-to-mixed buzz from test screenings.
4. Alice in Wonderland dir. Tim Burton: March 5th [Wide]
What's it all about?: 10 years after she first went down the rabbit hole, Alice returns to Wonderland after finding out about her arranged marriage, only to find that the Red Queen has taken control.
Who's in it?: Johnny Depp, Mia Wasikowska, Helena Bonham Carter, Anne Hathaway, Michael Sheen, Alan Rickman, Christopher Lee
Why?:
  • Wonderful, wonderful cast, filling all of the right roles (Bonham Carter looks hysterical).
  • Not only is it not a direct remake, it's based off of parts of Lewis Carroll's books that weren't featured in the classic Disney cartoon version.
  • The mix of live action and CGI is beautiful, albeit cartoony.
  • Mia Wasikowska has proven her talent on the TV show "In Treatment".
  • Alice wearing battle armor. 'Nuff said.
Why Not?:
  • Is Johnny Depp's role too prominent? The title is ALICE in Wonderland, not The Mad Hatter in Wonderland, after all.
  • Will the CGI/live action blend somehow backfire?
  • It's yet another Burton film that isn't original. Seriously, when is he going to make another Edward Scissorhands-esque movie?
3. Clash of the Titans dir. Louis Leterrier: March 26th [Wide]
What's it all about?: A man born of a god, Perseus, must try to stop the minions of the underworld from breaking free to wreak havoc on the earth.
Who's in it?: Sam Worthington, Liam Neeson, Ralph Fiennes, Pete Postlethwaite, Gemma Artreton, Alexa Davalos, Danny Huston
Why?:
  • Rockin' trailer.
  • Finally, a halfway decent movie rooted in Greek mythology (special effects have come a long way since the original film was made).
  • The studio has enough faith in the film that it's actually being given MORE money to film extras scenes and add in more gods/monsters.
  • Sam Worthington officially takes his place as the new king of sci-fi/fantasy blockbusters.
  • Liam Neeson and Ralph Fiennes as feuding gods: Schindler vs. Goeth was nothing compared to Zeus vs. Hades.
Why Not?:
  • Louis Leterrier isn't the best director, even for action driven films; his Hulk reboot was brain dead when it wasn't in action mode.
  • Could the added gods/monsters result in an overcrowded film with forced appearances from famed mythological creatures?
  • Is Worthington going to deliver the same level of bland "tough leading man" schtick as in Avatar?
2. A Prophet (Un Prophete) dir. Jacques Audiard: February 12th [Limited]
What's it all about?: [from Imdb] A young Arab man is sent to a French prison where he becomes a mafia kingpin.
Who's in it?: Tahar Rahim, Niels Arestrup, Adel Bencherif
Why?:
  • The critically hailed drama, finally making its stateside debut, has earned comparisons to The Godfather.
  • Chilling trailer that promises a combination of character study and blazing guns.
  • Interesting setting/angle (French Muslims).
Why Not?:
  • It could end up being either just "good", or hugely overrated.
1. Shutter Island dir. Martin Scorcese: February 19th [Wide]
What's it all about?: Two federal marshals search for a murderess who somehow escaped a top security facility.
Who's in it?: Leonardo DiCaprio, Mark Ruffalo, Ben Kinglsey, Emily Mortimer, Michelle Williams, Patricia Clarkson, Jackie Earle Hayley, Max Von Sydow
Why?:
  • Great cast, great trailer, great director, great source material.
  • Dennis Lehane novels have a pretty successful track record as far as adaptations go.
  • It wasn't pushed back to finish editing or re-shoot; test screening results have been through the roof.
  • Martin Scorcese directing a psychological mystery/thriller/horror film? Count me in.
Why Not?:
  • The same screenwriter also wrote Oliver Stone's Alexander.
  • It's going to hurt a lot when you realize that the current Oscar season would have been so much more interesting if this film had been released back in October.
  • It's going to hurt even more if the film gets snubbed for next year's awards due to its terrible timing (two weeks before the Oscar ceremony).

Friday, October 30, 2009

Third trailer for "Shutter Island"

AKA: that movie that should have been released in early October...


Shutter Island - Exclusive Trailer

Friday, October 2, 2009

Second "Shutter Island" (2010) trailer




I'm guessing it's not a coincidence that this is being released on what was SUPPOSED TO BE the film's release date...

Friday, August 21, 2009

(UPDATE) Shocker: Paramount delays "Shutter Island" until Feb. 19th, 2010!


This baffles me. As the author of the article below says, this film is ALREADY on people's Oscar radars, so why bother moving it to the beginning of the new year? And the so-called "logic" at the end of the graph? Nonsense. If the 10 Best Picture slots idea is still around next year, then wouldn't movie studios want to put more films at the end of the year, so that they're really fresh on people's minds when the nomination ballots are sent out? And if the Academy returns to only having five Best Picture nominees for 2010, then Shutter Island is royally screwed. Paramount, WHAT WERE YOU THINKING?

Source: DeadlineHollywood.com

SHOCKER! Paramount Moves Scorsese's 'Shutter Island' To February 19, 2010

EXCLUSIVE: This Shutter Island decision is now the second major studio pic to jump from fall 2009 to February 2010 (after Universal's The Wolfman recently moved off November). But Paramount's adaptation of the Dennis Lehane novel directed by Marty Scorsese and starring Leonardo DiCaprio looked entrenched for October 2nd and this coming awards season. For godsakes, the pic is already on people's Oscar list. Such a surprise delay is just going to compound all the buzz surrounding the picture and its great trailer released in June. An insider tells me. "It tested in the high 80s/low 90s and Scorsese even brought it down to 2 hours." So what's the problem? I hear that Paramount told the filmmakers it doesn't have the financing in 2009 to spend the $50M to $60M necessary to market a big awards pic like this. ("Given where the DVD business is in 2009, our only hope is the economy and the retail business rebounds in 2010 because the hardest hit segment has been movies that play to an older adult audience," a studio source tells me.) So the studio settled on the release date of mid-February because "that's when Silence Of The Lambs came out" back in 1991 and it won the Oscar. "Now that the Academy has Best Picture to 10 films," an insider notes to me, "it will be easier for a movie that came out in the beginning of the year to get nominated for Best Picture."

*UPDATE: I'm also told that, among the many reasons for the move, Leo wasn't going to be available to promote the pic internationally.*

Um...guys? In case you haven't noticed, Mr. DiCaprio is not the only star you have in your arsenal to promote the film. You've got Mark Ruffalo, Sir Friggin' Ben Kingsley, Emily Mortimer, Michelle Williams, and Patricia Clarkson.