Showing posts with label tranformers 2. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tranformers 2. Show all posts

Monday, March 22, 2010

Dammit, now I actually have a good reason to see "Transformers 3"




How do you do it Michael Bay? How do you keep finding reasons to make me see your shitty, indulgent blockbusters that always suck and are totally ripe for parody? I mean, you roped in an Oscar winner this time! Come on, Frances McDormand! You're better than that! Come on Ken Jeong! You're better than that! Come on, John Malkovich! You're...um. eh....

Source: Ain't It Cool News

Merrick here...


Over on his official website, Michael Bay talked TRANSFORMERS 3 status.

We are going to shoot in LA, Chicago, Washington DC, Florida, Texas, Africa, Moscow, and China. On the talent front, we just locked in Frances McDormand and John Malkovich. Both amazing actors I've always wanted to work with. We also just got Ken Jeong, he is the super funny actor stuck in the trunk from “Hangover” and the Doctor from “Knocked Up.

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

"Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" - REVIEW


The biggest surprise I got from "Transformers 2" was that I didn't HATE it. It left me puzzled, until a quick conversation with a friend made me realize why that was so. The film might be hollow crap, but it's well polished hollow crap. As much as Michael Bay is a hack of a director, it's hard to deny the impressive visual effects, and even some of the cinematography (there are some beautifully composed shots, in terms of lighting). Some of the fight scenes are fun to watch as well. HOWEVER....

The one word that comes to mind when I think of "Revenge of the Fallen" is: dumb. And I mean, D-U-M-B. With everything from the protagonist's mom high on pot brownies talking about how she heard her son lose his virginity, to obnoxious twin robots reduced to bad black/latino stereotypes, to not one, but TWO scenes of small dogs humping, to Megan Fox trying to "act", to the Smithsonian museum opening onto a DESERT, this is one lazy effort in the creative/writing department (and 2/3 of the writers also wrote "Star Trek"......). I'll spare you from too many plot details because they'll only leave you with a headache. Opening with a flashback, we find out that the autobots/decepticons have been on Earth MUCH longer than anyone ever knew. An older generation called The Primes landed on Earth thousands of years ago and even got into some nasty fights with ancient humans. This sounds fine, but once you learn enough later in the movie, you come to realize that it basically makes the hunt for the first film's Macguffin (the Allspark) seem trivial compared to what has (supposedly) been at stake the entire time. And this is just one of several plot holes big enough to drive an aircraft carrier through. There's also the question of how two VERY old transformers can teleport, but our "younger" robot heroes can't.

But hey, you argue, "Transformers" isn't meant to be a piece of art, it's an action flick! So why am I determined to judge it so harshly? Because I know that Hollywood is *gasp* capable of better. Let's compare Transformers with Pirates of the Caribbean. The first installments of both trilogies were big hits with fantastic special effects that kept audiences coming back for more. But there's one key difference: characters. Jack Sparrow alone elevated the weakest moments of the inferior "Pirates" sequels, because he was a charming, quirky, ORIGINAL character. Transformers has NEVER had that. The robots are barely given anything resembling personalities, which is more than I can say for the human characters. And even as Michael Bay strives to make his sequel bigger and better, there's never a chance to connect with these characters. So even though the massive fight at the end is cool to look at, it's hard to feel any genuine excitement, because most of the robots (good and bad) never have a chance to do anything to define themselves. Take for instance, a very cool looking autobot named Sideswipe. He gets some really bad-ass action moments in the opening chase in Shanghai, but basically NEVER SEEN AGAIN until the final fight. The same goes for the host of new decepticons, virtually all of whom make their first appearences at the FINAL BATTLE. Though there is a very cool tiger-like robot that gets a few neat scenes, it's meant to be more of a pet to the decepticons, and therefore never speaks. Again, this renders the action more "cool" than genuinely exciting. The only truly exciting moment isn't even a battle scene, but rather a scene where the decepticons try to perform some less than pleasant surgery on our protagonist. And even in the action Bay still can't figure things out. Though he has finally learned that it's best to show two giant robots fighting by pulling the camera BACK, there are times when the blocking is just stupid. Why on earth is part of the climactic duel shot so that great chunks of the action are blocked out by giant pillars? Don't hide the robots from us damnit! So, aside from flat out laziness and stupidity, is there ANYTHING else that could push this movie over the edge in ridiculouslness? As a matter of fact, there IS! In fact, there are two things, and I'll list them for you, but be warned...your head might just explode:

The Two Most Batsh*t Stupid Moments of Transformers 2:

  1. John Turturro in a THONG (because really, is there anything more sexually stimulating than John Turturro's ass in a thong?)
  2. A Decepticon with TESTICLES (aka: decepticles).
I'll leave you with that to think about...

Grade: C-

Sunday, June 14, 2009

First reviews of "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen"


It sounds like exactly what I expected it to be: loud, dumb, great action, bloated and plot-hole filled story. Hopefully all of Michael Bay's attempts at "storytelling" don't drag down the fun-factor too much like in the first movie.....

Orlando Parfitt, IGN UK: “The film reaches its pinnacle with one such action set-piece that takes place in a forest - a brilliantly crafted sequence that is kinetic, emotional and genuinely thrilling. Unfortunately however, it is a climax that comes only an hour or so into the movie - the remaining 80 or so minutes just never quite scale the same heights.” … “Bay could have cut 40 minutes from the bowels of Transformers 2, and it would have been a far more effective movie. Unfortunately, the director fell into the same trap with Pearl Harbour and Bad Boys II - each filled with spectacular moments, but both becoming bloated, arduous cinematic experiences that ultimately outstay their welcome.” … “Bay has refined and improved his technique when it comes to directing action since the first Transformers. Bay has - to an extent anyway - cleared this up in ROTF, with more lingering tracking shots, cleaner environments and establishing framing.”


Mark Samuels, Total Film:
“Fallen has much to admire.” … “It’s a thrill-ride, plain and simple. And it delivers.” … “The extended metal-on-metal punch-ups are cartoonish but, thanks to the game-raising CGI, utterly convincing.” … “Old folks may find the relentless sensory assault a little draining, but the bangs, ’bots and bombast ensure Fallen has everything Transformers fans will want and expect.”


SciFiNow: “the many, many, many devout fans of the first film will most likely get more than enough out of the sequel, but surely even they will concede there was significantly more to the 2007 box-office behemoth.” … “leaving something mechanical, uninteresting and soulless.” … “an ugly beast of a movie as robotic as its main attractions that could justifiably become the symbol of all that is wrong with modern day summer spectaculars.” … “Unlike the summer’s other big robot movie, Revenge Of The Fallen does have a personality, but it’s a frightfully detestable one. It celebrates all the wrong things with ferocious gusto, marking a new type of low for blockbusters.”

The Mirror:
“In terms of explosions, firepower and sheer shrill, all-action, popcorn entertainment it is hard to see how this big’n'bold sequel can be topped this year.” … “for the most part it is also a complex lumbering mess of a movie that is long on turgid backstory and short on tension, laughs and subtle acting.” … “It is a sprawlingly noisy adventure epic that entertains at times, but never really manages to engage. Still, the kids will love it!”

TheShiznit: “…succeeds because it’s ridiculous in all the right ways. Check your brain in with your coat and soak in the most gloriously dumb spectacle of the year.” … “Revenge Of The Fallen doesn’t stray too far from the solid framework built in the first movie. It mixes superb action sequences – directed with panache and almost pornographic glee by a never-better Bay – with frequent scenes of light comic relief, some of which work (squabbling robo-hick siblings Skids and Mudflap provide a few laughs), some of which don’t (Wheelie the RC truck humping Fox’s leg).” … “Yes, you could level the same accusations at Transformers as I and many others lobbed at Terminator Salvation. It’s over-long; it has plot holes you could steer an aircraft carrier through; it’s loud and stupid and relies too much on pyrotechnics. But the difference is, the Terminator franchise was never designed to be consumed and enjoyed as blockbuster entertainment. Transformers, on the other hand, was built from the ground up to be a popcorn-devouring, eye-popping, nostalgia-sparking crowd-pleaser – and Revenge Of The Fallen sees Michael Bay tick all those boxes and more.”

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Two clips from "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen"...in GERMAN!!

Something about that German dub on that small robot in the first clip is just absolutely hysterical to me in a way Michael Bay and crew probably never intended. Wow...I am SO mature....

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

New "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" trailer

Hopefully a high quality version will be released in the next few days. For now, we'll just have to settle for this...


Tuesday, April 7, 2009

2nd Quarter Preview: April, May June

With the first fourth of the year already behind us, we're finally starting to move away from start-of-the-new-year schlock, and into late spring/early summer, which means one thing: big budget action flicks. However, while the likes of "Star Trek" and "Wolverine" are just about certain to storm the box office, this list isn't populated entirely by typical big budget summer fare, and the number one choice is going to surprise most people, because I've only posted one or two things about my #1 most anticipated film of early summer. Without further adieu, the 12 to keep an eye over the course of April, May, and June....

12. Cheri (June 26th - Limited) - Think that summer movies are filled with too many explosions and not enough witty banter and pretty dresses? Then "Cheri", starring Michelle Pfeiffer and Kathy Bates, might just be your cup of (very sophisticated) tea. Set in 1920s Paris, the plot centers on Cheri (Rupert Friend...that's right..."Cheri" is a man), the son of a courtesan, must deal with the end of his relationship with an older woman (Pfeiffer) who educated him in the ways of love. Even if the movie sucks, it will still be worth a look for those of us who can't fathom how Michelle Pfeiffer still looks sexier than most "hot" 20 year old starlets (I'll take Madame Pfeiffer over that Lady Gaga wench any day, thank you very much).

Anticipation Meter: 6/10

11. The Brothers Bloom (May 15th/29th?? - Limited) - The twice delayed "Brothers Bloom" has finally secured a solid release date...so the marketing says. Let's hope that's a good thing, because I've been curious to see Rian Johnston's crime/spy/thriller/comedy for a while now. Adrian Brody and Mark Ruffallo play the titular brothers, who team up with their explosives expert (Rinko Kikuchi from "Babel") and a New Jersey heiress (Rachel Weisz) for one last con. Plot details have been (thankfully) kept relatively under wraps, despite the repeated delays, which is good, because "Bloom"'s plot seems like the sort of well-executed spy-farce packed with plot twists and double crosses (just like the delightful "Duplicity"). It will also be interesting to see Weisz, Brody, and especially Kikuchi (who irritated me to no end in "Babel") try their hands at comedy. Hopefully the casting risk pays off...

Anticipation Meter: 6.5/10

10. Angels and Demons (May 15th - Nationwide) - After the debacle that was "The Da Vinci Code", this prequel-turned-sequel has to be a step up...right? With Tom Hanks' hair looking considerably less awful (it's still an eye sore, however) and a plot more suited for a summer blockbuster (running around! assassins! car chases! explosions!), "Angels and Demons" has the potentially to transfer to the big screen much more smoothly than its predecessor, because it doesn't rely on a bunch of (mostly fake) facts to create the suspense/plot twists. Oh, and a quick message to the Vatican from one Catholic to another: regardless of whether you boycott this movie, people (yes, Catholics too...and probably lots of them) will still see this movie, so stop bitching about it, and go back to preaching the gospel and helping people. Also, will someone in the Vatican (anyone will do...most of you guys in there are superbly educated) please get the pope up to speed on condoms? Thanks.

Anticipation Meter: 6.5/10

09. Up (May 29th - Nationwide) - Perhaps the marketing team for "Up!" should be fired. With all the fantastic reports from test screenings, it seems odd that the trailers feel so...limp. The humor doesn't stick, and animation aside, it looks like a giant step below "Ratatouille" and "WALL-E" in terms of sophistication. Even the one or two clips released online aren't terribly impressive (one is downright "blah"). Is it just a case of bad trailers and seeing clips out of context, or does Pixar have another "Cars" on their hands?

Anticipation Meter: 6.5/10

08. The Soloist (April 24th - Nationwide) - Another delayed project from 08, this one is particularly note worthy for being a former Oscar hopeful. Directed by "Atonement"'s Joe Wright, "The Soloist" tells the true story of LA reporter Steve Lopez (Robert Downey Jr.) who stumbles upon a blind cello prodigy (Jamie Foxx). Lopez decides to write a story about the prodigy, and tries to help him achieve his dream of playing at the Walt Disney Concert Hall in Los Angeles. Thrown into the mix is Catherine Keener, playing yet another semi-likeable bitch (you're awesome Ms. Keener, but it's getting old), this time in the form of Lopez's co-worker. The trailer screams "schmaltz", so here's hoping that someone as skilled as Wright can make the story moving, without resorting to shameless heartstring-tugging. It should also be interesting to hear Wright collaborator Dario Marianelli's score; music for modern day stories isn't exactly his forte, so I'm interested to hear what he comes up with.

Anticipation Meter: 6.5/10

07. Terminator: Salvation (May 21st - Nationwide) - It's awkward to admit, but I've never seen any of the Terminator movies completely, though I do know a solid amount about the plot details. However, judging by the trailer, "Terminator: Salvation" has plenty of unresolved plot threads from the Terminator saga that will engage series fans, while also offering a basic overarching plot to draw in neophytes (humans vs. robots, apocalyptic setting, fate of mankind at stake, etc...). While the cast boasts Christian Bale as John Connor, the person I'm most interested to see is the as-yet-unrevealed Serena, apparently something of a villain, played by the always delightful Helena Bonham Carter.

Anticipation Meter: 7/10


06. Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (June 29th - Nationwide) - Just like with "Angels and Demons", I wasn't terribly fond of the predecessor to "Revenge of the Fallen". The first Transformers movie felt largely inert, with annoying attempts at comedy, and a surprisingly sluggish, action-free set up (though the big finale, ridiculous though it may be, was pretty spectacular). Hopefully, with all of Michael Bay's "characters" (I use that term very, very lightly) set up, he get stop trying to be a serious filmmaker and get right to the good stuff: big-ass robots beating the hell out of each other. With the addition of a slew of new Transfomers (both good and bad) ranging from a speedy tiger-like contraption, to a stadium-sized one who makes all others look like flies, "Transformers 2" has all the potential to be the biggest, loudest, dumbest, and certainly most explosion-filled sequel of the year. If done right, it will be the perfect summer action flick: a fun and exciting spectacle that allows you to check your brain at the door and enjoy the ride.

Anticipation Meter: 7/10


05. Star Trek (May 8th - Nationwide) - I've never been much of a "Star Trek" follower either, and for the longest time I didn't give a damn about JJ Abrams' reboot of the classic sci-fi show. And then that 2nd trailer came out. I've been excited ever since. With special effects slick enough to give "Transformers 2" a run for its money, and stunning worlds and action sequences, "Star Trek" seems to have done the impossible: updated a campy TV classic into a modern, relevant sci-fi epic.

Anticipation Meter: 7.5/10


04. State of Play (April 17th - Nationwide) - It's no easy task having to condense a complicated TV miniseries into a 2 hour movie, but judging from the trailers, director Kevin Macdonald and crew may have done just that. When a young Washington DC clerk/assistant is shot in a dark alley, it sets off an investigation not only from the police, but by a very determined reporter as well (Russell Crowe). Turns out, the young woman was having an affair with Crowe's former friend, a current senator (Ben Affleck) who's been investigating a suspicious company. As the case is dragged on further, Crowe and his fellow reporter (Rachel McAdams) start to hunt for the truth, even when the police, and their own boss (Helen Mirren) tell them that they should keep their noses out. All of it leads to "something" that's infinitely more complex and connected than anyone ever suspected. Hollywood has been in short supply of political thrillers that manage to be intense without relying on a car chase every five minutes, and "State of Play" might just be the movie to fill that void. With its stellar cast and gripping source material, it could be a nice late-spring surprise (the fact that it's being released around the same time as 2005's well-executed "The Interpreter" seems like a good sign as well).

Anticipation Meter: 8/10



.03 Wolverine (May 1st - Nationwide) - The comic book movie has enjoyed something of a renaissance this decade. First it was the success of the Spiderman franchise, and then Christopher Nolan's brilliant, brooding reinvention of Batman. On the flip side, there were the X-Men movies, which, while successful, never really got to the same level as the previous two series. The first two were incredibly fun, yes, but at times too cheeky, and overstuffed with characters, many of whom were teenage brats. By the time Brett Ratner's "X-Men 3" rolled out in 2006, the franchise seemed a bit stale. In a surprisingly smart move, 20th Century Fox decided to drop the cast of regulars (save for Hugh Jackman of course) to focus on the origin story of the quintessential X-men mutant: Wolverine. Jackman, though about a foot too tall, is still the perfect fit for Wolverine, and with a movie entirely dedicated to his character's story, he should have more room to shine. The reports that Jackman and director Gavin Hood wanted to make the film more dark and less family friendly are also encouraging, just as long as Hood and crew don't completely leave out the sense of fun (judging by some of Liev Schreiber's one liners, it would seem that the humor is intact). But if you're afraid of suffering from seeing too much Wolverine, there will be plenty of other fun characters to make things go "boom". There's Schreiber's Sabretooth, who becomes Wolverine's arch nemesis, John Wraith (Wil. i. am) who can become invisible, Emma Frost (Tahya Tozzi) who has control over ice, Deadpool (Ryan Reynolds), who's something of a gravity defying, twin blade whirling ninja, and Gambit (Taylor Kitsch), who has the power to charge inanimate objects with energy, which can turn even playing cards into deadly weapons. So while this may be Wolverine's story, don't expect Jackman to hog the screen the whole time; he'll have plenty of on-screen company to keep things interesting.

Anticipation Meter: 8/10



02. Away We Go (May 29th - Limited) - The cheap, "Juno"-riffic poster aside, Sam Mendes' immediate follow-up to the so-so "Revolutionary Road" is a dark drama/comedy for adults, that, even if it's only half as good as its trailer, will still be a winner. Burt (John Krasinski) and Verona (Maya Rudolph) are going nowhere in their lives until Verona suddenly becomes pregnant. Seeing no point in sticking around their dilapidated house, the couple sets out across America to try and find a suitable place to start their family, while encountering family members and friends along the way. The cast alone is enough of a reason to see it (Krasinski, Rudolph, Catherine O'Hara, Jeff Daniels, Maggie Gyllenhaal, and queen-of-the-scene-stealers Allison Janney), but the fact that it's written by Dave Eggers (who wrote the tragic, yet sometimes painfully funny A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius) and his wife is an added plus. The man has a way with dialogue, and with Mendes behind the camera, we could have something really special on our hands.

Anticipation Meter: 9/10



01. The Limits of Control (May 1st - Limited) - "Away We Go" may have the funniest trailer of the year so far, but nothing comes close to matching "The Limits of Control"'s trailer in terms of sheer intrigue. Part independent drama, part bizarre espionage tale, it's hard to elaborate on the plot, because the trailer gives so little away, all while making you think, "I HAVE to see this movie!!" Though Isaach De Bankole, as the guitar playing main character, may not be a household name even among art-house theater goers, there's plenty of other big names to round out the ensemble: Bill Murray, John Hurt, Gael Garcia Bernal, "The Visitor"'s overlooked Hiam Abbass, and Tilda Swinton, sporting some costumes 10 times more bizarre than anything she's ever worn on the red carpet. Perhaps what makes the film so intriguing, stellar cast aside, is that it is a small film that still looks very polished, but without looking like it has compromised any of its individuality. And these days, that's hard to come by, which is why even seeing the trailer for films like "The Limits of Control" is enough to make you realize that, yes, there is still room in Hollywood for creativity to grow freely.

Anticipation: 9/10

Monday, February 16, 2009

First trailer for "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen"



Hopefully this time Michael Bay will stop pretending to care about character development and simply deliver what any Transformers movie should: robots beating the crap out of each other, and lots and lots of explosions.

Friday, January 30, 2009

Concept art from "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen": Soundwave


I have no idea is this even remotely resembles the Soundwave character from the cartoons, but it looks pretty cool...